Reference · stays inside this course
Appendix J — Final assessment and certification rubric
Academy reading copy. This lesson is not offered as a file download.
Appendix J — Final assessment and certification rubric Administration Written assessment: 60 minutes, open manual, individual work. Each item is worth 2 points unless locally documented otherwise. Passing written score: 39/48 (at least 80%). The written test does not replace factcheck, oral LACE, rapid-response, capstone, conduct, and 90-day requirements. Final assessment — 24 items
Appendix J — Final assessment and certification rubric Administration Written assessment: 60 minutes, open manual, individual work. Each item is worth 2 points unless locally documented otherwise. Passing written score: 39/48 (at least 80%). The written test does not replace factcheck, oral LACE, rapid-response, capstone, conduct, and 90-day requirements. Final assessment — 24 items
Define antisemitism in your own words and include both group hostility and conspiracy.
Name the five ERASE moves and give one example of any move.
Distinguish anti-Judaism from modern racial antisemitism.
Explain how legal/economic restrictions helped create the “Jew and money” stereotype.
Why is limpieza de sangre important to the history of inherited exclusion?
Give two reasons the Protocols of the Elders of Zion can remain influential after exposure as a forgery.
Define Zionism for this course and state one internal diversity or moral-duty point.
Write the four-part test for a responsible Holocaust comparison.
State one shared point and one difference of emphasis among IHRA, JDA, and Nexus.
Name the four source-ladder levels and the proper use of a D-level source.
Name the five future scenarios and explain why they are not a prediction ladder.
Put the six incident-response steps in order.
A post says, “I oppose this Israeli bill because section 4 violates judicial review.” Classify it on the information given and say what could change your analysis.
A reply says, “Jews own every court, so the bill is theatre.” Identify the pattern and a proportionate response.
An incident report says “antisemitism rose 40%.” List four questions required before publishing the number.
A venue proposes screening all Arabic-speaking guests more heavily. Explain the error and a behavior-based alternative.
A Jewish student is doxxed. Name the first four protective steps and two details that must not be amplified.
A household has a kit but no child-reunification or medicine plan. Explain why it is not ready and give two corrections.
A synagogue buys cameras but has no alternate decision lead or communication test. Identify the governance problem and one metric.
A close ally uses an antisemitic trope while supporting Jewish safety. Draft a two-sentence LACE response with a boundary.
A viral clip is a D-level source and the speaker’s address appears in comments. Choose R-level, roles, and first public holding line.
Name one alarming and one protective indicator in future-scenario work; state what evidence would raise or lower concern.
ReJEWenate publishes a wrong statistic. Write the five parts of a trustworthy correction.
Design one 90-day outcome in each lane—know, protect, grow—and add a review or sunset rule. Written assessment model points # TWO-POINT MODEL 1 Hostility/prejudice/discrimination/violence toward Jews as Jews + conspiratorial explanation/collective guilt. 2 Essentialize, Reverse, Assign, Strip, Escalate + valid example. 3 Religious/theological opposition versus inherited/racialized unchangeable Jewish essence; overlap acknowledged. 4 Restrictions narrowed visible roles; propaganda erased context/diversity and converted constraint into alleged essence. 5 Ancestry could bar a Christian convert/descendant, institutionalizing inherited suspicion beyond professed belief. 6 Any two: self-sealing logic; sponsors/incentives; adaptation to new crises; identity/belonging; institutional repetition; familiar imagery. 7 Diverse Jewish self-determination/return in ancestral homeland; not one government; internal streams and/or duties of morality/equal dignity. 8 Specific mechanism; similarity; difference; purpose/evidentiary value (with no shock/erasure). 9 All allow Israel criticism and use context; differ in wording/examples/emphasis and application concerns. 10 A authoritative/primary; B quality independent; C specialist/advocacy; D social lead only—investigate, do not publish as fact. 11 Brittle normalization, institutional exclusion, coordinated intimidation, acute crisis, resilient reversal; can coexist/change and are possible futures, not fixed stages. 12 Safety; help; preserve evidence; record facts; report responsibly; rebuild strength. 13 Policy criticism/non-antisemitic on given facts; context could add collective blame, trope, discrimination, threat, fabricated evidence, or unequal standard. 14 Secret Jewish control; ask for evidence/name trope, correct or moderate without unnecessary amplification. 15 Any four: source/method, place/period, unit, denominator, definition, baseline, reporting changes/underreporting, cross-country comparability. 16 Identity profiling is inaccurate/discriminatory; use behavior, credentials, role, access, threat specificity, capability, and consistent rules. 17 Protect person/safety, preserve evidence, contact appropriate authorities/platform/institution, restrict spread; do not repeat address, family/school/work routines, or vulnerabilities. 18 People/roles/communication/reunification/medical access are missing; assign child pickup/out-of-area contact and qualified medicine/refrigeration backup. 19 Equipment without authority/process/maintenance creates false confidence; metric could be named alternates verified or alert reaching a defined share in a test. 20 Listen/acknowledge/clarify/evidence + explicit refusal of trope; relationship does not excuse harm. 21 R2/R3 due to rapid claim + doxxing; verifier/safety/decision/liaison/comms/recorder; holding line says context being verified and personal data must not be shared. 22 Valid observed risk + valid protection, with source/baseline/threshold and an evidence-based raise/lower condition. 23 What we said; what evidence now shows; what changed; corrected statement; update time/source and same-audience visibility. 24 One measurable knowledge outcome, one tested safety/continuity outcome, one Jewish-life/ally outcome + owner/review and adaptation/sunset. Performance rubric DOMAIN 4 — LEADS 3 — COMPETENT 2 — DEVELOPING 1 — UNSAFE / INACCURATE History/definitions Precise continuity/change; restores Jewish life; teaches others. Accurate sequence and boundaries. Gaps or overgeneralization; corrects with support. False analogy, denial/distortion, or collective labeling. DOMAIN 4 — LEADS 3 — COMPETENT 2 — DEVELOPING 1 — UNSAFE / INACCURATE Verification Fast, transparent, source-rich; anticipates errors. Decomposes, corroborates, labels uncertainty. Relies on weak source or misses context. Fabricates/bluffs or publishes D-level claim as fact. Safety/privacy Calm authority, access, continuity, and referrals. Correct triage; protects data; stays in scope. Unclear roles or over/under escalation. Exposes data/vulnerability, profiles, livestreams, or investigates alone. Communication Audience-specific, human, actionable, correctable. LACE, evidence, boundary, concrete ask. Defensive, jargon-heavy, or objective unclear. Rage bait, humiliation, threats, deception, collective blame. Leadership/coalition Builds durable systems and trust across difference. Clear roles, fair standards, follow-up. Activity without outcome/owner. Coerces conformity, tokenizes, or ignores misconduct by allies. Certification decision REQUIREMENT RESULT / EVIDENCE ASSESSOR / DATE Written knowledge ≥80% Fact-check rubric ≥85% LACE oral competent Rapid response: no critical failure Capstone approved 90-day plan approved Code signed 60-day supervised practice complete Decision: certify / remediate / do not certify