Reference · stays inside this course
Appendix K — 90-day ReJEWenate launch plan and dashboard
Academy reading copy. This lesson is not offered as a file download.
Appendix K — 90-day ReJEWenate launch plan and dashboard Plan control FIELD ENTRY Community / lead / alternates Population and languages Start / 30 / 60 / 90-day reviews Safeguarding/privacy/legal/security reviewers Budget / in-kind resources Public correction / complaints channel Independent or external reviewer Three-lane plan LANE BASELINE 90-DAY OUTCOME ACTIONS OWNER / PARTNER MEASURE / SOURCE REVIEW / SUNSET KNOW PROTECT GROW Recommended cadence PERIOD DELIVER REVIEW Days 0–2 Confirm authority, contacts, public limits, corrections, first action; announce truth promise.
Critical safety/privacy gap check. Days 3–14 Baseline survey; first education session; contact card; partner outreach; evidence pack. Participation/access and source audit. Days 15–30 First fact-check/LACE lab; household clinic; governance action; Jewish-life event/content. 30-day review; correct plan assumptions. Days 31–60 Tabletop; bystander/ally training; campaign pilot; close priority corrective actions. Supervised practice review; complaints/corrections.
Days 61–90 Second drill or evidence test; partner action; outcome measurement; next-cohort decision. Independent review; continue, adapt, scale, or sunset.
Dashboard — disaggregate where safe and lawful OUTCOME BASELINE TARGET 90-DAY RESULT SOURCE / CAVEAT DECISION Definition/boundary accuracy Verification accuracy OUTCOME BASELINE TARGET 90-DAY RESULT SOURCE / CAVEAT DECISION Confidence without overconfidence Reporting route awareness Household plan completion Institution corrective actions closed Alert/continuity test performance Bystander/ally actions completed Jewish-life participation/belonging Corrections/complaints resolved Accessibility and language reach Unintended harm / profiling / privacy Audit questions
Did knowledge improve across age, language, disability, community size, and prior experience—or only for the easiest-to-reach group?
Did reporting become more complete and proportionate, or did fear create overreporting and profiling?
Were affected people supported and informed about follow-up?
Did safety measures reduce access, privacy, dignity, or legal rights for any group?
Were corrections timely and visible? Did leaders model uncertainty?
Which relationships produced real reciprocal action, not only statements?
Which activities had no measurable outcome and should be adapted or ended?
Did Jewish learning, participation, welcome, or joy grow alongside preparedness? 90-day board report REPORT LINE ENTRY What changed What did not change Best evidence Limitations / missing voices Corrections / complaints / harms Resources spent Continue / adapt / scale / sunset Next 90-day decision and owner